Why Fly? Prudential Value, Climate Change, and the Ethics of Long-distance Leisure Travel

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (5):689-707 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that the prudential benefits of long-distance leisure travel can justify such trips even though there are strong and important reasons against long-distance flying. This is because prudential benefits can render otherwise impermissible actions permissible, and because, according to dominant theories about wellbeing, long-distance leisure travel provides significant prudential benefits. However, this ‘wellbeing argument’ for long-distance leisure travel must be qualified in two ways. First, because travellers are epistemically privileged with respect to knowledge about what is good for them, they must look critically at their own assessment of the prudential benefits of a trip. Second, the wellbeing argument is unlikely to support prudential arguments for long-distance leisure trips made by frequent flyers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-25

Downloads
165 (#127,246)

6 months
10 (#313,380)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Willem van der Deijl
Tilburg University
Dick Timmer
Dortmund University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
What’s Wrong with Joyguzzling?Ewan Kingston & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (1):169-186.

View all 40 references / Add more references