Replies to Greco and Turner

Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2617-2620 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dan Greco and Jason Turner wrote two fantastic critiques of my book, The Construction of Logical Space. Greco’s critique suggests that the book can be given a Kuhnian interpretation, with a Carnapian twist. Here I embrace that interpretation. Turner criticizes one of the views I develop in the book. Here I identify an avenue of resistance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies to Greco and Turner.Agustin Rayo - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2617-2620.
Replies to Richard Fumerton, John Greco, and Michael Williams.Ernest Sosa - 2011 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1 (2):138-149.
On the general argument against internalism.John Turri - 2009 - Synthese 170 (1):147 - 153.
Turner’s Golden Vision.Jason M. Kelly - 1995 - American Journal of Semiotics 12 (1-4):211-228.
Replies to Greco, Corbí, Moya, Grimaltos.Christopher Hookway - 2000 - Philosophical Issues 10 (1):395 - 399.
Le bilinguisme gréco-latin et la question des langues dans le monde gréco-romain.Bruno Rochette - 1998 - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 76 (1):177-196.
The Facts in Logical Space: A Tractarian Ontology.Jason Turner - 2016 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-25

Downloads
9 (#1,219,856)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Grounding, Essence, And Identity.Fabrice Correia & Alexander Skiles - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (3):642-670.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references