Agrobiodiversity Under Different Property Regimes

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):285-303 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Having an adequate and extensively recognized resource governance system is essential for the conservation and sustainable use of crop genetic resources in a highly populated planet. Despite the widely accepted importance of agrobiodiversity for future plant breeding and thus food security, there is still pervasive disagreement at the individual level on who should own genetic resources. The aim of the article is to provide conceptual clarification on the following concepts and their relation to agrobiodiversity stewardship: open access, commons, private property, state property and common heritage of humankind. After presenting each property regime, we will examine whether and how these incentivize the conservation, improvement and sharing of crop genetic resources, and conclude by defending a mixed property regime

Similar books and articles

Sovereign and Property Rights Over Plant Genetic Resources.Carlos M. Correa - 1995 - Agriculture and Human Values 12 (4):58-79.
Biotechnology is Compatible with Sustainable Agriculture.Donald Duvick - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):112-125.
Scenario: A Look Toward the Future. [REVIEW]Robert S. Grossmann - 1990 - Agriculture and Human Values 7 (3-4):19-22.
Kant Goes Fishing: Kant and the Right to Property in Environmental Resources.Angela Breitenbach - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (3):488-512.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-23

Downloads
158 (#78,652)

6 months
38 (#28,714)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

Two Treatises of Government.John Locke - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Two Treatises of Government.Roland Hall - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):365.

View all 37 references / Add more references