Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (4):653-73 (2015)
AbstractThis paper defends Michel Foucault’s notion of archaeology of knowledge against the influential and putatively devastating criticism by Dreyfus and Rabinow that Foucault’s archaeological project is based on an incoherent conception of the rules of the discursive practices it purports to study. I argue first that Foucault’s considered view of these rules as simultaneously implicit and historically efficacious corresponds to a general requirement for the normative structure of a discursive practice. Then I argue that Foucault is entitled to that view despite the charges to the contrary by Dreyfus and Rabinow. I also explain in detail how the argument by Dreyfus and Rabinow arises from a misunderstanding of Foucault’s archaeological project as transcendental inquiry, while archaeology of knowledge is, in fact, a diagnostic project. The result is a novel understanding of the notion of archaeology of knowledge that enables a reassessment of Foucault’s philosophical work in connection with current debates regarding the relationship between reflection and practice in the structure of thought.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Foucault's Historiographical Expansion: Adding Genealogy to Archaeology.Colin Koopman - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (3):338-362.
Foucault's History of the Present as Self-Referential Knowledge Acquisition.Patrick Baert - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (6):111-126.
Foucault, Cavaillès, and Husserl on the Historical Epistemology of the Sciences.David Hyder - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (1):107-129.
Reconstructing Foucault: Essays in the Wake of the 80s.Ricardo Miguel-Alfonso & Silvia Caporale-Bizzini - 1994 - Rodopi.
Deep History: Reflections on the Archive and the Lifeworld.James Dodd - 2016 - Continental Philosophy Review 49 (1):29-39.
On Historicity and Transcendentality Again. Foucault’s Trajectory From Existential Psychiatry to Historical Epistemology.Elisabetta Basso - 2012 - Foucault Studies 14:154-178.
Michel Foucault and Judith Butler: Troubling Butler's Appropriation of Foucault's Work.Kathleen Ennis - unknown
Implicit Knowledge: How It is Understood and Used in Feminist Theory.Alexis Shotwell - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (5):315-324.
Rupture and Transformation: Foucault’s Concept of Spirituality Reconsidered.Jeremy Carrette - 2013 - Foucault Studies 15:52-71.
An Investigation of Foucault's Archaeology from the Perspective of "Historical a Priori".Hui Zhou - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 2:59-65.
Knowledge of Meaning.Bernhard Weiss - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):75 - 94.
Archives and the Event of God: The Impact of Michel Foucault on Philosophical Theology.David Galston - 2010 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
References found in this work
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.
The Return of the Myth of the Mental.Hubert L. Dreyfus - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (4):352 – 365.
Citations of this work
Methodological Individualism V. Holism in Hegel and Marx.Jake McNulty - 2022 - Hegel Bulletin 43 (2):305-319.
Conceptual Analysis for Genealogical Philosophy: How to Study the History of Practices After Foucault and Wittgenstein.Colin Koopman - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (S1):103-121.
Reparative Critique, Care, and the Normativity of Foucauldian Genealogy.Bonnie Sheehey - 2020 - Angelaki 25 (5):67-82.