The Moon Hoax: Debates About Ethics in 1835 New York Newspapers

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 15 (2):89-100 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This research examines published editorials and letters to the editor at the time of one of the first and most bizarre newspaper frauds in this country-the infamous moon hoax of 1835, perpetuated by the New York Sun and reporter Richard Adams Locke. The purpose is to focus on what was written about the practice of journalism before, during, and after the moon hoax-thereby providing a more complete understanding of the journalistic environment that gave birth to the fabrication. This article taps directly into discussion of journalism ethics printed in 4 leading New York City dailies: The Evening Post, The Herald, the combined Morning Courier & New York Enquirer, and the New York Sun.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond the hoax: science, philosophy and culture.Alan D. Sokal - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The disappearing media ethics debate in letters to the editor.Brian Thornton - 1998 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (1):40 – 55.
Today's codes mirror credo of Benjamin Harris.Albert C. Skaggs - 1985 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 1 (1):37 – 41.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#431,270)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations