The Justification of Liberalism

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):199 - 217 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are a number of grounds for criticizing what the state requires of one, and for thinking that one no longer has an obligation to obey it. I will begin by attempting to locate liberalism amongst such grounds. It is useful for this purpose to contrast two headings under which these grounds may fall. Firstly, there are criticisms concerning the content of the requirements of the state. In this case exception is taken to what it is that the law requires quite apart from the process by which it was arrived at. If Jews are legally prevented from practising certain professions, and objection is taken because no state should make laws debarring persons from certain professions on religious grounds, the objection is one of content. Secondly, there are grounds concerning the procedure by which a decision was reached. If it is thought that the British Government ought not to have signed the Treaty of Rome because no referendum was taken on whether the electorate wanted Britain to join, exception is taken to the procedure by which this decision was made. The objection could be made by one who thought that British entry was the best policy. liberalism lays down principles concerning the permissible content of what is required by the state.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,418

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is There a Neutral Justification for Liberalism?†.Harry Brighouse - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):193-215.
Hegel, the Greeks and Subjectivity: the origins of modern liberty and the historical justification of liberalism.David Edward Rose - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 18 (48):381-417.
Health care and human rights: against the split duty gambit.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (4):343-364.
Morality and Political Obligation. Y. Satyanarayana - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:103-110.
Are Political Obligations Content Independent?George Klosko - 2011 - Political Theory 39 (4):498-523.
Morality and Political Obligation.Y. V. Satyanarayana - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:103-110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
27 (#688,520)

6 months
8 (#462,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mill's liberalism.H. J. McCloskey - 1963 - Philosophical Quarterly 13 (51):143-156.

Add more references