Thought and Image

Abstract

Thought is not based on an image that is isomorphic to the object. Descartes, Husserl, Frege, Wittgenstein and Brandom progressively overcome this Aristotelian misconception of the intentionality of thinking.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Image-based de re thought.Xiaoqiang Han - 2008 - Disputatio 2 (24):17.
Image Content.Mohan Matthen - 2014 - In Berit Brogaard (ed.), Does Perception Have Content? Oxford University Press. pp. 265-290.
Flashforward: The Future is Now.Patricia Pisters - 2011 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 (Suppl):98-115.
For Giving.Stephen David Ross - 2009 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:469-504.
Samuel Beckett and the philosophical image.Anthony Uhlmann - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Manifest Image and the Scientific Image.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1999 - In Diederik Aerts, Jan Broekaert & Ernest Mathijs (eds.), Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 29-52.
Putting the image back in imagination.Amy Kind - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):85-110.
The trouble with images.R. L. Franklin - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (March):113-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
276 (#69,748)

6 months
165 (#16,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David L. Thompson
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 36--56.

Add more references