Rejoinder to Leland B. Yeager, "An Economist Responds" (Spring 2005): Clarity and the Standard of Ethics

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 6 (2):473 - 476 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thomas clarifies his basic criticism of Yeager's book, Ethics as Social Science, emphasizing his concern about lack of clarity of argument rather than style. Thomas discusses the role of ethical standards in contextual moral reasoning and defends Rand's rejection of ethical altruism against criticisms that it represents a "corner solution" or an unrealistic slippery-slope argument

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Economist Reads Philosophy. [REVIEW]William Thomas - 2004 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 5 (2):401 - 408.
Reply to Leland B. Yeager: Rhetorical Incorrectness?James Arnt Aune - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):231 - 234.
Economic Incorrectness. [REVIEW]Leland B. Yeager - 2001 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):145 - 150.
Review of Review of Leland Yeager, Ethics as Social Science. [REVIEW]Roderick Long - 2003 - Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6:89-98.
Reason and cultural evolution.Leland B. Yeager - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (2):324-335.
Clarity and the grammar of skepticism.Chris Barker - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (3):253-273.
More science not less clarity: A rejoinder to Richardson.William J. Matthews - 1998 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):46-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
13 (#968,869)

6 months
4 (#657,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references