Reply to Arne Heise's 'The incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian economics and the unsuccessful escape from old ideas'

Economic Thought 10 (2):20 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,354

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review. [REVIEW]Sheila Dow - 1991 - Economics and Philosophy 7 (1):132-139.
A Reply to Patton's "Incommensurability and the Bonfire of the Meta-Theories".Moti Mizrahi - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (10):51-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-11

Downloads
12 (#1,108,968)

6 months
1 (#1,740,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 3 (1):158-162.
Science and the open society: the future of Karl Popper's philosophy.Mark Amadeus Notturno - 2000 - New York, N.Y.: Central European University Press.

Add more references