NanoEthics 8 (3):227-240 (2014)
Abstract |
This paper analyzes a European research project called ‘Deepening Ethical Engagement and Participation in Emerging Nanotechnologies’ with the abbreviation DEEPEN. The DEEPEN’s findings and conclusions on the narratives, public understandings and the lay ethics of nanotechnologies are examined in a critical manner. Through a criticism of the theoretical framings of what constitutes a narrative and the application of a different theoretical framing of narratives, the paper argues that the findings and conclusion of the DEEPEN should be approached with caution as there are several unjustified claims concerning the contextualization of the findings. Such claims pertain to the theoretical framing of narratives, virtue ethics, modernity, lay attitudes, and earlier research
|
Keywords | Ethics Nanotechnology Narratives Cultural Theory Laypeople Deficit Model |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11569-014-0202-1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1983 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments.Max Horkheimer - 2002 - Stanford University Press.
View all 18 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.Wessel Reijers, David Wright, Philip Brey, Karsten Weber, Rowena Rodrigues, Declan O’Sullivan & Bert Gordijn - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1437-1481.
A Lay Ethics Quest for Technological Futures: About Tradition, Narrative and Decision-Making.Simone van der Burg - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (3):233-244.
Quibbling and the Fallacy of Critical Scholarship: Response to Thorstensen.Heidrun Åm - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (3):251-254.
Technoscience in Society: A Diversity of Interfaces.Christopher Coenen - 2016 - NanoEthics 10 (3):229-231.
Similar books and articles
Quibbling and the Fallacy of Critical Scholarship: Response to Thorstensen.Heidrun Åm - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (3):251-254.
Narrative, Nanotechnology and the Accomplishment of Public Responses: A Response to Thorstensen.Matthew Kearnes, Phil Macnaghten & Sarah R. Davies - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (3):241-250.
Narratives of Mastery and Resistance: Lay Ethics of Nanotechnology. [REVIEW]Phil Macnaghten - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):141-151.
Deliberating Risks Under Uncertainty: Experience, Trust, and Attitudes in a Swiss Nanotechnology Stakeholder Discussion Group.Regula Valérie Burri - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):143-154.
Engaging Narratives and the Limits of Lay Ethics: Introduction. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann & Phil Macnaghten - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):133-140.
Introduction: The Ethical Challenges of Nanotechnologies. [REVIEW]Alan Petersen - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):9-12.
Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies.Rene von Schomberg (ed.) - 2010 - Publications Office of the European Union.
Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Do New Ethical Issues Arise at Each Stage of Nanotechnological Development?Céline Kermisch - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):29-37.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-08-13
Total views
7 ( #1,071,464 of 2,518,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,142 )
2014-08-13
Total views
7 ( #1,071,464 of 2,518,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads