Indirect Discourse Is Not Quotational

The Monist 60 (3):340-354 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The interpretation of indirect discourse is one of the most persistent and pervasive themes in post-Fregean semantics. Since Frege we have managed to learn a good deal about the workings of various technical approaches to indirect discourse, but fundamental philosophical issues have remained unresolved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpreted logical forms as objects of the attitudes.M. Dusche - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (4):301-315.
The puzzle of free indirect discourse.Yael Sharvit - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3):353-395.
Lifting the church-ban on quotational analysis: The translation argument and the use-mention distinction. [REVIEW]Diederik Olders & Peter Sas - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (2):257-270.
Addressing Higher-Order Misrepresentation with Quotational Thought.Vincent Picciuto - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (3-4):109-136.
Token-Reflexivity and Indirect Discourse.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 6:37-56.
Indirect Discourse, Relativism, and Contexts That Point to Other Contexts.Christopher Gauker - 2010 - In François Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds.), Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity in Language and Thought. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 6--283.
Indirect speech acts.Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):183 - 228.
Identity in indirect discourse.J. G. Barense - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (12):381-382.
Inscriptions and Indirect Discourse.Marilyn P. Frye - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (24):767-772.
On the formalisation of indirect discourse.R. L. Goodstein - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (4):417-419.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
74 (#215,284)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richmond Thomason
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Hyperintensionality and Normativity.Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
A model theory for propositional attitudes.Richmond H. Thomason - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1):47 - 70.
Believing in semantics.John C. Bigelow - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1):101--144.
Quotational theories of propositional attitudes.M. J. Cresswell - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1):17 - 40.
The knower paradox in the light of provability interpretations of modal logic.Paul Égré - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (1):13-48.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references