In Burçin Ercan (ed.), Interactions in the History of Philosophy II. Delta Publishing House. pp. 39-46 (2015)

Authors
Athanasia Theodoropoulou
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Abstract
This paper offers an interpretative presentation of Duns Scotus’ notion of intellect, as it is delineated in his treatise entitled De Spiritualitate et Immortalitate Animae Humanae. Duns Scotus’ theory is gradually formed through his critical examination of the Aristotelian views which are presented in De Anima and Metaphysics.Duns Scotus accepts the Aristotelian definition of the soul, according to which the soul knows and thinks through its intellective power, and he claims that the intellective soul is the proper form of man. However, he is opposed to Aristotle’s theory concerning the imperishability of the intellect, holding that since the intellect is the form of the perishable composite, it cannot exist apart from the composite. Furthermore, adopting the Aristotelian view that only human beings have two cognitive powers, the senses and the intellect, Duns Scotus shows the supremacy of the intellect compared to the senses. He distinguishes intellectual knowledge from sense knowledge by designating their functions and objects. Intellectual knowledge is an immaterial and non organic act in contradistinction to sense knowledge, which is a material and organic act; the intellect perceives abstract objects whereas the senses grasp particular objects. Although Duns Scotus proves that intellectual knowledge is superior to sense knowledge, he recognizes the contribution of the senses in acquiring knowledge inasmuch as he holds that the intellect understands only when it is rotated to the outside world: the intellect knows the universal by perceiving the intellectual images through the medium of imagination (phantasia), which modifies sense images to intellectual images (phantasms). Therefore, for Duns Scotus, knowledge would be impossible without cooperation between the intellect and the senses.
Keywords Theory of Knowledge  Duns Scotus  Aristotle
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Duns Scotus on the Immaterial.Stephen Priest - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):370-372.
Freedom Beyond Practical Reason: Duns Scotus on Will-Dependent Relations.Tobias Hoffmann - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (6):1071-1090.
Woluntaryzm i intelektualizm w etyce Jana Dunsa Szkota.Martyna Koszkało - 2012 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 83 (3):441-458.
Duns Scotus on Material Substances and Cognition: A Discussion of Two Recent Books. [REVIEW]Giorgio Pini - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):769-779.
The Distinction Between Nature and Will in Duns Scotus.Tobias Hoffmann - 1999 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 66:189-224.
Sobre a vida e a obra de Duns Scotus.Luís Alberto De Boni - 2008 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 53 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-11-12

Total views
26 ( #426,800 of 2,462,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,768 of 2,462,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes