Rolston, Lonergan, and the Intrinsic Value of Nature

Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):105 - 128 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In recent metaethical debate over ways to justify the notion of intrinsic natural value, some neopragmatists have challenged realist conceptions of scientific and moral truth. Holmes Rolston defends a critical-realist epistemology as the basis for a metaphysics of "projective nature" and a cosmological narrative--both of which set up a historical ontology of objective natural value. Pure ecological science informs the wilderness experience of Rolston's ideal epistemic subject, the "sensitive naturalist." The author argues that Rolston's account of the relation between knowing and valuing can be clarified and strengthened by appropriating Bernard Lonergan's transcendental method. Conversely, Lonergan's view of moral self-transcendence can be developed further in light of Rolston's virtue epistemology, which is embodied in the figure of the sensitive naturalist



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rolston on intrinsic value: A deconstruction.J. Baird Callicott - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
Can Nature be Evil?Wayne Ouderkirk - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150.
Rolston's Theory of Value.Katie McShane - 2007 - In Christopher J. Preston and Wayne Ouderkirk (ed.), Nature, Value, Duty: Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston, III. Springer.
Hunting ≠ predation.Paul Veatch Moriarty & Mark Woods - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (4):391-404.
Rolston’s Theological Ethic.Francisco Benzoni - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (4):339-352.
Natural Theology In an Ecological Mode.Mark Wynn - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):27-42.
Following human nature.Nathan Kowalsky - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):165-183.
The Source and Locus of Intrinsic Value.Keekok Lee - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):297-309.
Are Values in Nature Subjective or Objective? Rolston - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):125-151.


Added to PP

40 (#400,954)

6 months
3 (#984,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references