Abstract
The evolution of Husserl’s thought did not follow a linear route. Time and again,
crucial changes were taking place in its course. The content of fundamental concepts
was shifting; successive discoveries of new thematics were happening; incessant
expansions of the ever-under-rework teachings to new fields of application were
being developed. The evaluation of Husserl’s work in its entirety becomes, thus,
an extremely difficult task. The huge bulk of the writings, the multifariousness of
their thematics, and the successive reforms and shifts in it make the understanding of
even the overall plan wherein the intermediate findings fall very difficult. One thing,
though, is certain. In order to overcome all these obstacles to approaching Husserl’s
work, we must first deepen our understanding of his method, the phenomenological
method of philosophizing. Whatever is said in Husserl’s Phenomenology makes
sense and has its value only to the extent that it is a result of ‘the’ phenomenological
reduction.