Evaluating Explanations in Law, Science, and Everyday Life

Abstract

��This article reviews a theory of explanatory coherence that provides a psychologically plausible account of how people evaluate competing explanations. The theory is implemented in a computational model that uses simple artificial neural networks to simulate many important cases of scientific and legal reasoning. Current research directions include extensions to emotional thinking and implementation in more biologically realistic neural networks.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Models of scientific explanation.Paul Thagard & Abninder Litt - 2008 - In Ron Sun (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 549--564.
Why wasn't O.J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference.Paul Thagard - 2003 - Cognition and Emotion 17 (3):361-383.
Out of their minds: Legal theory in neural networks. [REVIEW]Dan Hunter - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):129-151.
Explanatory coherence (plus commentary).Paul Thagard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):435-467.
Homogeneity and explanatory depth.John Meixner - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (3):366-381.
Everyday life and cultural theory: an introduction.Ben Highmore - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
The Objects of Acceptance: Competing Scientific Explanations.Ronald C. Hopson - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:349 - 363.
Introduction: From legal theories to neural networks and fuzzy reasoning. [REVIEW]Lothar Philipps & Giovanni Sartor - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):115-128.
Probabilistic networks and explanatory coherence.Paul Thagard - 1997 - In [Book Chapter].
Situational logic and covering law explanations in history.Michael Martin - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):388 – 399.
How a neural correlate can function as an explanation of consciousness: Evidence from the history of science regarding the likely explanatory value of the NCC approach.Ilya Farber - 2005 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (4-5):77-95.
The Nature of Dynamical Explanation.Carlos Zednik - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (2):238-263.
Basic Everyday Life and Civilized Human Life.Alexander V. Maslikhin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:149-156.
Explanation in scientists and children.William F. Brewer, Clark A. Chinn & Ala Samarapungavan - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (1):119-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
48 (#323,919)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Thagard
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Conceptual Revolutions.Paul Thagard - 1992 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
How Scientists Explain Disease.Paul Thagard - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
Explanatory coherence (plus commentary).Paul Thagard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):435-467.

View all 12 references / Add more references