- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Second thoughts about Expert Political Judgment: reply to the symposium
Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):467-488 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment.Albena Azmanova - 2012 - Columbia University Press.
'I'-thoughts and explanation: Reply to Garrett.Jose Luis Bermudez - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):432–436.
Introduction to judgment aggregation.Christian List & Ben Polak - 2010 - Journal of Economic Theory 145 (2):441-466.
Surrender of judgment and the consent theory of political authority.Mark C. Murphy - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115 - 143.
Surrender of judgment and the consent theory of political authority.C. M. - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115-143.
Citizenship and political judgment: Between discourse ethics and phronesis.Ricardo Blaug - 2000 - Res Publica 6 (2):179-198.
Ethics and budget allocation decisions of municipal budget officers.Jacqueline L. Reck - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (4):335 - 350.
Sensus communis as a foundation for men as political beings: Arendt’s reading of Kant’s Critique of Judgment.Annelies Degryse - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):345-358.
An antinomy of political judgment: Kant, Arendt, and the role of purposiveness in reflective judgment.Avery Goldman - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):331-352.
Have the experts been weighed, measured, and found wanting?Bryan Caplan - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):81-91.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-21
Downloads
47 (#322,078)
6 months
7 (#339,156)
2014-01-21
Downloads
47 (#322,078)
6 months
7 (#339,156)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Against Epistocracy.Paul Gunn - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):26-82.
Political Epistemology, Technocracy, and Political Anthropology: Reply to a Symposium on Power Without Knowledge.Jeffrey Friedman - 2020 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 32 (1):242-367.
References found in this work
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin & Daniel Kahneman (eds.) - 2002 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors.Philip E. Tetlock - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):451-471.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-tstkh uwo