Falsification of Interpretive Hypotheses in the Humanities

Roczniki Filozoficzne 66 (2):87-106 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper reconsiders the possibility of applying the procedure of falsification, which consists in testing a theory by confronting hypotheses derived from the theory with empirical data, in the studies of culture, in particular when evaluating interpretive hypotheses. Falsification, to which, according to Popper and his followers, the natural sciences owe their success, is viewed with strong suspicion when the object of investigation is meanings and values rather than material phenomena. If by interpretation one understands reconstruction of the artefact’s meaning, obvious challenges when falsifying interpretive hypotheses include: the multiplicity, instability and ambiguity (indefiniteness or self-contradictory character) of meanings inherent in artefacts. All of this does not seem to exclude the possibility of identifying as misreadings interpretive hypotheses which clearly contradict relevant (non-contradictory) artefactual evidence. Falsification thus understood seems indispensable in educational contexts. At the same time, it must be admitted that in practice (as contrasted with the logical formula which underlies the procedure) falsification is inconclusive, and the application of the procedure is further complicated when meanings and values are the object of research. This is one of the reasons why falsification in the humanities (as elsewhere) needs to be complemented by other epistemic procedures while the status of literary studies or history of philosophy might best be perceived as partly cognitive (and in so far as the research conducted in these disciplines is empirically testable, also scientific) and partly creative (artistic).



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,685

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pierre Duhem on the Testing of Hypotheses.Glen C. Joy - 1979 - Philosophy Research Archives 5:1-24.
Die Falsifikation Statistischer Hypothesen/The falsification of statistical hypotheses.Max Albert - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):1-32.
Contextual falsification and scientific methodology.Jarrett Leplin - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (4):476-490.
Systems, inquiry, and the meanings of falsification.Ian I. Mitroff - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (2):255-276.
Is Falsification Falsifiable?Ulf Persson - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (3):461-475.
Language, Essence, Falsification.Eduardo Neiva - 2002 - American Journal of Semiotics 18 (1-4):173-192.
Falsificationism falsified.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (3):275-286.


Added to PP

16 (#766,264)

6 months
3 (#434,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Validity in interpretation.E. D. Hirsch - 1967 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:493-494.
Validity in Interpretation.George Dickie - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (4):550-552.
Validity in Interpretation.E. D. Hirsch - 1967 - Foundations of Language 7 (4):602-605.
The methods of contemporary thought.Józef Maria Bochenski - 1965 - Dordrecht, Holland,: D. Reidel Pub. Co..
The methods of contemporary thought.J. M. Bochenski & Peter Caws - 1965 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 157:424-425.

View all 8 references / Add more references