The Relevance of Fink’s Notion of Operative Concepts for Derrida’s Deconstruction

Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 50 (1):50-67 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn the literature on Derrida’s philosophical formation, the name of Eugen Fink is usually forgotten. When it is recalled, it is most often because of his 1930s articles on phenomenology. In this paper, I claim on the contrary that Fink’s writings exerted a lasting influence on Derrida’s thought, well beyond his early phenomenological works. More specifically, I focus on a 1957 paper presented at a conference on Husserl’s thought where Fink formulates an important distinction between operative and thematic concepts. By adopting both historical and theoretical perspectives, I show how this couple of notions can help to understand Derrida’s singular way of reading philosophical texts. In particular, I present the Derridean concept of supplement as a reworking of Fink’s notion of operative concept. I conclude by suggesting that deconstruction can be understood in part as a radicalization of Fink’s theses.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-26

Downloads
30 (#755,642)

6 months
8 (#600,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pietro Terzi
University Paris Nanterre (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations