Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (4):257-284 (2007)

Abstract
The starting point for the contemporary debate about theories of health should be the holistic theory of Lennart Nordenfelt, claims George Khushf, not the refuted theory of Christopher Boorse. The present paper is an attempt to challenge Nordenfelt and to present an alternative theory to his and other theories, including Boorse’s. The main problems with Nordenfelt’s theory are that it is relativistic, that it leads to counter-intuitive results as to what goals can count as healthy, that it focuses on the wrong kind of abilities, that it makes measuring health extra difficult, and that it does not give us a sufficient account of health, at most a necessary one. The alternative theory proposed is two-dimensional. First, health is to have developed the abilities and dispositions that members of one’s culture typically develop, and be able to use them, in acceptable circumstances; and second, health is to experience positive moods and sensations, the kinds that have internal causes. The theory solves the problems attached to Nordenfelt’s theory by not being individual relativistic, by eliminating the goals in the definition, by giving an alternative interpretation of “ability,” by making health easier to measure, and by adding the dimension of well-being that, together with health as ability, not only gives us a necessary, but also a sufficient, account of health.
Keywords Ability  basic ability  environment  goals  health  holistic theory  suffering  well-being
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11017-007-9043-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Health as a Theoretical Concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
On the Distinction Between Disease and Illness.Christopher Boorse - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1):49-68.
A Rebuttal on Health.Christopher Boorse - 1997 - In James M. Humber & Robert F. Almeder (eds.), What is Disease? Humana Press. pp. 1--134.
What a Theory of Mental Health Should Be.Christopher Boorse - 1976 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 6 (1):61–84.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Empowerment: A Conceptual Discussion.Per-Anders Tengland - 2008 - Health Care Analysis 16 (2):77-96.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Place of Fuzzy Health in Medical Theory.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):639 – 649.
Nordenfelt's Theory of Disability.Steven D. Edwards - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):89-100.
On Medicine and Health Enhancement - Towards a Conceptual Framework.Lennart Nordenfelt - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1):5-12.
Towards a New Paradigm for Health Promotion.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):315-317.
Concepts of Health and Their Consequences for Health Care.Lennart Nordenfelt - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (4):277-285.
Health and Welfare in Animals and Humans.Lennart Nordenfelt - 2011 - Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):139-152.
The Concept of Health and Disease.József Kovács - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1):31-39.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
98 ( #120,664 of 2,518,172 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,762 of 2,518,172 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes