The Intention Debate in German Criminal Law

Ratio Juris 17 (3):346-380 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers the various suggestions that have been put forward by German scholars to replace the traditional concept of intention, which the author has criticized elsewhere (Taylor 2004). The debate on this topic has become a minor academic industry in Germany, and should be better known as the English-speaking world struggles with its own concepts of intention. Despite the great amount of effort and ingenuity devoted to this topic in Germany, however, the author concludes that only one theory of intention, that put forward by Professor Wolfgang Frisch, shows any substantial degree of promise

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Punishment and Permissibility in the Criminal Law.Vincent Chiao - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (6):729-765.
Harm and culpability.A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Towards a theory of criminal law?R. A. Duff - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Philosophical foundations of criminal law.Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Defeasible reasoning in japanese criminal jurisprudence.Katsumi Nitta & Masato Shibasaki - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (1-2):139-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
49 (#310,442)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations