Animal Rights and Human Needs

Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea that animal rights can be married to environmental ethics is still a minority opinion. The land ethic of Aldo Leopold, as interpreted by J. Baird Callicott, remains fundamentally at odds with the ascription of substantial rights to (nonhuman) animals. Similarly, Laura Westra’s notion of “respectful hostility,” which attempts to reconcile a holistic environmental ethic with “respect” for animals, has no place for animal rights.In this paper, I argue that only by ascribing rights to sentient animals can an environmental ethic avoid an unacceptable degree of anthropocentrism because only a rights-based environmental ethic can prohibit humans from significantly interfering with sentient animals when human vital needs are not at stake. A rights view that permits significant interference when it is required for the satisfaction of human vital needs avoids problems that otherwise plague a rights view. The “vital-needs rights view” reconciles the rights of animals with the satisfaction of human vital needs—including the vital need to have a flourishing natural environment—suggesting a possible alliance between animal rights and deep ecology and revealing the connections among vital needs, capitalism, and environmental degradation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal rights: Autonomy and redundancy. [REVIEW]David Sztybel - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
Moral rights and animals.H. J. McCloskey - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):23 – 54.
A Defense of Animal Rights.Aysel Dog˘an - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):473-491.
Live Free or Die. [REVIEW]Joel Marks - 2010 - Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
Obligations to animals are based on rights.Tom Regan - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):171-180.
The rights of humans and other animals.Tom Regan - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):103 – 111.
Animal rights: moral theory and practice.Mark Rowlands - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#149,097)

6 months
6 (#199,414)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Relevance (and Irrelevance) of Questions of Personhood (and Mindedness) to the Abortion Debate.David Kyle Johnson - 2019 - Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 1 (2):121‒53.
Environmental ethics and trophy hunting.Alastair S. Gunn - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):68-95.
The moral status of non-human beings and their ecosystems.Michel Dion - 2000 - Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (2):221 – 229.
The Impacts of Animal Farming: A Critical Overview of Primary School Textbooks.Rui Pedro Fonseca - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (3):1-22.
The moral status of non‐human beings and their ecosystems.Michel Dion - 2000 - Philosophy and Geography 3 (2):221-229.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Animal Liberation.J. Baird Callicott - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.

View all 9 references / Add more references