University of Chicago Press (2014)
AbstractIn _Abductive Analysis_, Iddo Tavory and Stefan Timmermans provide a new navigational map for constructing empirically based generalizations in qualitative research. They outline an accessible way to think about observations, methods, and theories that nurtures theory-formation without locking it into predefined conceptual boxes. The authors view research as continually moving back and forth between a set of observations and theoretical generalizations. To craft theory is to then pitch one’s observations in relation to other potential cases, both within and without one’s field. The book provides novel ways to approach the challenges that plague qualitative researchers across the social sciences—how to think about the relation between methods and theories, how to conceptualize causality, how to construct axes of variation, and how to leverage the researcher’s community of inquiry. _Abductive Analysis_ is a landmark work that shows how a pragmatist approach provides a more productive and fruitful way to conduct qualitative research
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Patient and Family Descriptions of Ethical Concerns.Hae Lin Cho, Christine Grady, Anita Tarzian, Gail Povar, Jed Mangal & Marion Danis - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):52-64.
Comparing Abduction and Retroduction in Peircean Pragmatism and Critical Realism.Bridget Ritz - 2020 - Journal of Critical Realism 19 (5):456-465.
Cruel Optimism and Precarious Employment: The Crisis Ordinariness of Academic Work.Kate Daisy Bone - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 174 (2):275-290.
Round Table: Is the Common Ground Between Pragmatism and Critical Realism More Important Than the Differences?Karin Zotzmann, Emily Barman, Douglas V. Porpora, Mark Carrigan & Dave Elder-Vass - 2022 - Journal of Critical Realism 21 (3):352-364.
Similar books and articles
Abductive Reasoning and Qualitative Research.Martin Lipscomb - 2012 - Nursing Philosophy 13 (4):244-256.
Loop Analysis and Qualitative Modeling: Limitations and Merits. [REVIEW]James Justus - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):647-666.
Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide.Sonali K. Shah & Kevin G. Corley - manuscript
A Philosophical Analysis of the General Methodology of Qualitative Research: A Critical Rationalist Perspective. [REVIEW]Abraham Rudnick - 2014 - Health Care Analysis 22 (3):1-10.
Abductive Reasoning and the Formation of Scientific Knowledge Within Nursing Research.Maj-Britt Råholm - 2010 - Nursing Philosophy 11 (4):260-270.
Abductive Inferences and the Structure of Scientific Knowledge.M. D. Bybee - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):25-46.
Including Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews: Opportunities and Problems.Mary Dixon-Woods, Ray Fitzpatrick & Karen Roberts - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):125-133.
Qualitative Analysis of Content By.Yan Zhang & Barbara M. Wildemuth - 2005 - Human Brain Mapping 30 (7):2197-2206.
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research.Jonathan A. Smith - 2009 - Sage Publications.
Qualitative Scientific Modeling and Loop Analysis.James Justus - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1272-1286.
Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and the Ethics of Body and Place: Critical Methodological Reflections. [REVIEW]Stuart J. Murray & Dave Holmes - 2014 - Human Studies 37 (1):15-30.