Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (8):953-980 (2010)

The political philosopher John Gray is a foremost critic of the liberal tradition. But while many have engaged with Gray concerning aspects of this tradition, few have challenged Gray’s conception of the tradition as a whole. Yet it is precisely this broader, background element in Gray’s account that is most problematic and that requires excavation if we are to reveal the deeper shortcomings of his critique as a whole. This article challenges Gray’s claim, made in 2000, that the liberal tradition is capable of being understood in terms of two faces — one representing the ‘universalist’ aspects of that tradition and the other representing the more pragmatic, value-pluralist, modus vivendi aspects. By focusing on Gray’s erroneous interpretation of the key universalist figure of John Locke, we see how his dichotomous account of the liberal tradition collapses at both ends. The article then looks at Gray’s most recent defence of his critique of liberalism, in 2007, and shows how many of the errors that characterize his 2000 account are compounded in 2007 as Gray seeks to build on his earlier position in contradictory directions. In all these ways therefore, this article seeks to defend the integrity of the liberal tradition by showing how Gray’s excoriating critique falls short
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453710379028
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Letter Concerning Toleration.John Locke & James H. Tully (eds.) - 1963 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Reply to Critics.John Gray - 2006 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (2):323-347.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Post‐Liberalism Vs. Temperate Liberalism.Struan Jacobs - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (3):365-375.
Synaesthesia Misrepresented.Adam Wager - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (3):347-351.
John Gray's Pluralist Critique of Liberalism.George Crowder - 1998 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (3):287–298.
Rawls on Pluralism and Stability.Robert B. Talisse - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (1-2):173-194.
Where Pluralists and Liberals Part Company.John Gray - 1998 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):17 – 36.
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Michael Sandel - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, in Association with the Open University. pp. 336-343.


Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #269,854 of 2,506,520 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,520 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes