Work/Life Integration

In Christopher Luetege (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer. pp. 1191--1202 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some provisions of the UN’s Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) are clearly important from the perspective of business ethics, particularly those calling for equal rights for women to employment and financial security. Some other provisions of CEDAW are equally as important for ethical business practices and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), but are frequently overlooked because of the presumption that they are not strictly business concerns: the rights of women to participation in public life, marriage, and family rights; the rights of rural women to adequate living conditions; and general rights to equality. This chapter will discuss the conceptual commitments that underlie the assumption of a clear demarcation between work and life concerns, and examine the criticisms of this assumption made by feminism. It will, in particular, be interested in: • The public/private distinction • The meaning of “work” or “labor” • The relationship between CSR and care ethics • Fostering a broader understanding of the family or familial relations • Examining the connection between fair wages and work/life integration These discussions suggest that the ability for businesses worldwide to uphold the tenets of CEDAW is dependent upon a reconsideration of the character of the Ideal Worker and a nuanced understanding of the effects of workplace policies on the wider communities in which businesses operate. In particular, though work/life integration is not strictly speaking a “women’s issue,” the ethical and policy considerations addressed herein currently have disproportionately negative effects for women; thus, addressing them is crucial for achieving the aims of gender equality.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Work: The process and the person. [REVIEW]A. R. Gini & T. Sullivan - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):649 - 655.
Gender issues in US science and technology policy: Equality of what?Susan E. Cozzens - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):345-356.
How Friendly are Family Friendly Policies?Gloria H. Albrecht - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):177-192.
OIKOS: Convergence in business ethics. [REVIEW]William Johnson Everett - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):313 - 325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-19

Downloads
344 (#56,293)

6 months
54 (#77,515)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erin C. Tarver
Emory University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ethics of care: personal, political, and global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Justice, Gender and the Family.Susan Moller Okin - 1989 - Hypatia 8 (1):209-214.
The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oup Usa. Edited by David Copp.
The Ethics of Care. Personal, Political, and Global.Virginia Held - 2007 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (2):399-399.

View all 10 references / Add more references