The Monist 62 (1):43-53 (1979)

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is less ambitious than its title might suggest, since it does not deal with everything that Plato has said on time and on eternity. Rather, it attempts to clarify some issues which have arisen in the controversy as to whether Parmenides or Plato was the first Western philosopher to grasp the notion of atemporal eternity. It is particularly concerned with some publications on the subject that have appeared within the last twelve years or so. G. E. L. Owen, in a paper published in this journal, has defended his earlier interpretation that Parmenides discovered the notion of atemporal eternity. J. Whittaker for his part has contended that both Parmenides and Plato failed to grasp it, and would ascribe its discovery to some later thinker. Yet another scholar, G. Reale, believes that there is no essential difference between the position of Parmenides as reconstructed by Owen and others and that of Melissus. For Reale maintains that Melissus’ formula “it is and always was and always will be” does not exclude atemporality, that it means the same thing as the alleged tenseless ‘is’ predicated of Parmenides’ Being.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist19796214
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Melissus, Time and Eternity.Massimo Pulpito - 2017 - Peitho 8 (1):107-124.
Melissus as a Critic of Parmenides: A Mimetic Rivalry.Massimo Pulpito - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 21:17-40.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Time, Duration and Eternity in Spinoza.Bruce Baugh - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):211-233.
Two Recent Interpretations of Plato's Parmenides.Egil A. Wylter - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):200 – 211.
Atemporal Duration: A Reply to Fitzgerald.Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann - 1987 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):214-219.
Anaxagoras Betwixt Parmenides and Plato.John E. Sisko - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):432-442.
Eternity Has No Duration.Katherin A. Rogers - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (1):1 - 16.
Time(s), Eternity, and Duration.Herbert J. Nelson - 1987 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22 (1/2):3 - 19.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total views
63 ( #179,525 of 2,498,932 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,932 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes