In Knud Haakonssen (ed.), Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 272-86 (1996)
AbstractThis essay compares and contrast Priestley and Burke on the nature of progress and politics and why, after having begun as political comrades, they arrived at such different evaluations of the French Revolution. Priestley had a robust account of progress, Burke a fragile one. Priestley's ideal, unlike Burke's, was not that of civic virtue but that of commercial virtue. By restricting the scope of government, Priestley diminished the status of the political virtues.
Similar books and articles
Reid and Priestley on method and the mind.Alan Tapper - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):511-525.
Joseph Priestley and Edmund Burke: An unpublished letter.W. H. G. Armytage - 1956 - Annals of Science 12 (2):160-161.
Joseph Priestley.Alan Tapper - 2002 - In Philip B. Dematteis Peter S. Fosl (ed.), British Philosophers 1500–1799. Columbia, USA: Broccoli Clark Layman. pp. 307-23.
Joseph Priestley, Scientist, Philosopher, and Theologian.Isabel Rivers & David L. Wykes (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
The Beginnings of Priestley's Materialism.Alan Tapper - 1982 - Enlightenment and Dissent 1 (1):73-81.
The Apocalyptic Politics of Richard Price and Joseph Priestley: A Study in Late Eighteenth Century English Republican Millennialism.Jack Fruchtman - 1771 - American Philosophical Society.
Reid and Priestley on Method and the Mind.Alan Tapper - 2003 - In John Haldane Stephen Read (ed.), The Philosophy of Thomas Reid. pp. 98-112.
Essay Review: Priestley Enlightened. [REVIEW]Robert E. Schofield & J. Jones - 1999 - Annals of Science 56 (1):95-98.
Priestley Duality for Paraconsistent Nelson’s Logic.Sergei P. Odintsov - 2010 - Studia Logica 96 (1):65-93.
Priestley Style Duality for Distributive Meet-semilattices.Guram Bezhanishvili & Ramon Jansana - 2011 - Studia Logica 98 (1-2):83-122.
Two conceptions of liberalism: Theology, creation, and politics in the thought of Immanuel Kant and Edmund Burke.Christopher J. Insole - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):447-489.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads