Joseph Priestley and the Argument from Design

Intellectual History Review 30 (1):65-85 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Joseph Priestley was notorious for rejecting much of orthodox Christianity and replacing it with a materialistic Unitarianism, in another respect he was an orthodox theist of his time in that he passionately upheld the Argument from Design. The Argument from Design was the heart of his “rational religion”. He contended that natural order, especially biological order, could only be successfully explained by intentional agency. At the time, however, the Argument was coming under attack, first from David Hume, then from Matthew Turner, and lastly from Erasmus Darwin. Priestley replied to each of these critics. This article surveys his replies. The three critics of the Argument contended that intelligent agency could offer only a weak explanation of natural order or that natural order is self-explanatory or that natural mechanisms can explain biological order. Priestley in turn critiqued all three contentions, arguing that the Argument is a strong explanation; that natural order cannot be self-explanatory; and that the proposed natural explanations conflict with the empirical evidence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Design and its discontents.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):271 - 289.
Design and its discontents.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):271-289.
David Hume and Intelligent Design: A Counter Criticism.Benjamin Martin - 2021 - Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (1).
Humean Natural Believing and the Design Argument.Girard John Brenneman - 2004 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Priestley's Metaphysics.Alan Tapper - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Western Australia
What is wrong with intelligent design?Gregory W. Dawes - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-20

Downloads
25 (#653,738)

6 months
9 (#356,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Tapper
Curtin University, Western Australia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dialogues concerning Natural Religion.David Hume & Nelson Pike - 1973 - Religious Studies 9 (2):237-238.
Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.[author unknown] - 1931 - Humana Mente 6 (21):111-115.
Joseph Priestley.Alan Tapper - 2002 - In Philip B. Dematteis Peter S. Fosl (ed.), British Philosophers 1500–1799. Columbia, USA: Broccoli Clark Layman. pp. 307-23.

View all 6 references / Add more references