Classical Antiquity 32 (2):406-438 (2013)

This paper seeks to bridge two aspects of Fronto's letters, erotics and rhetoric, by demonstrating that Fronto himself merges the two areas in his discourse with Marcus Aurelius about their relationship. Whereas some letters suggest an unequal relationship based on power, others encourage the identification of Fronto with Marcus. Fronto achieves this identification by structuring their relationship itself as a metaphor in which he and Marcus are equated and linked by epistolary bonds. I close by discussing why the epistolary genre in particular is an apt site for the merger of metaphor and love.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1525/ca.2013.32.2.406
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,512
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy.Ted Cohen - 1978 - Critical Inquiry 5 (1):3-12.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Meditations: With Selected Correspondence.Robin Hard (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Marcus Aurelius.John Sellars - 2015 - Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy.
Fronto P. 128,17 FF. Van den Hout.Marcus Deufert - 1998 - Mnemosyne 51 (6):724-726.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #1,283,432 of 2,520,899 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,899 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes