The limit of language in daoism

Asian Philosophy 14 (2):191 – 205 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The paper is concerned with the development of the paradoxical theme of Daoism. Based on Chad Hansen's interpretation of Daoism and Chinese philosophy in general, it traces the history of Daoism by following their treatment of the limit of language. The Daoists seem to have noticed that there is a limit to what language can do and that the limit of language is paradoxical. The 'theoretical' treatment of the paradox of the limit of language matures as Daoism develops. Yet the Daoists seem to have noticed that the limit of language and its paradoxical nature cannot be overcome. At the end, we are left with the paradoxes of the Daoists. In this paper, we jump into the abyss of the Daoists' paradoxes from which there is no escape. But the Daoists' paradoxes are fun!



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

128 (#145,367)

6 months
24 (#121,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Koji Tanaka
Australian National University

Citations of this work

A Re-examination of the Paradox of the Dao.Sangmu Oh - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (4):483-501.
A Paradox of Vulnerability.Julianne Nicole Chung - 2019 - Res Philosophica 96 (3):373-382.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.

View all 39 references / Add more references