The limit of language in daoism

Asian Philosophy 14 (2):191 – 205 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is concerned with the development of the paradoxical theme of Daoism. Based on Chad Hansen's interpretation of Daoism and Chinese philosophy in general, it traces the history of Daoism by following their treatment of the limit of language. The Daoists seem to have noticed that there is a limit to what language can do and that the limit of language is paradoxical. The 'theoretical' treatment of the paradox of the limit of language matures as Daoism develops. Yet the Daoists seem to have noticed that the limit of language and its paradoxical nature cannot be overcome. At the end, we are left with the paradoxes of the Daoists. In this paper, we jump into the abyss of the Daoists' paradoxes from which there is no escape. But the Daoists' paradoxes are fun!

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#155,610)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Koji Tanaka
Australian National University

Citations of this work

A Paradox of Vulnerability.Julianne Nicole Chung - 2019 - Res Philosophica 96 (3):373-382.
A Re-Examination of the Paradox of the Dao.Sangmu Oh - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (4):483-501.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Behaviorism 15 (1):73-82.

View all 36 references / Add more references