Two epistemological challenges regarding hypothetical modeling

Synthese 200 (6) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sometimes, scientific models are either intended to or plausibly interpreted as representing nonactual but possible targets. Call this “hypothetical modeling”. This paper raises two epistemological challenges concerning hypothetical modeling. To begin with, I observe that given common philosophical assumptions about the scope of objective possibility, hypothetical models are fallible with respect to what is objectively possible. There is thus a need to distinguish between accurate and inaccurate hypothetical modeling. The first epistemological challenge is that no account of the epistemology of hypothetical models seems to cohere with the most characteristic function of scientific modeling in general, i.e., surrogative representation. The second epistemological challenge is a version of “reliability challenges” familiar from other areas. There is a challenge to explain how hypothetical models could be a reliable guide to what is possible, given that they are not and cannot be compared against their nonactual targets and updated accordingly. I close with some brief remarks on possible solutions to these challenges.

Similar books and articles

Agent-based Models as Fictive Instantiations of Ecological Processes.Steven L. Peck - 2012 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 4 (20130604).
Two Kinds of Exploratory Models.Michela Massimi - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (5):869-881.
Modeling Hypothetical Consent.Mikko Wennberg - 2003 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 17 (3):17œ34.
Modeling Hypothetical Consent.Mikko Wennberg - 2017 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 3:17-34.
Hypothetical Metaphysics of Nature.Michael Esfeld - 2009 - In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter. pp. 341-364.
On the hypothetical and non-hypothetical in reasoning about belief and action.Peter Railton - 1997 - In Garrett Cullity & Berys Nigel Gaut (eds.), Ethics and practical reason. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 53--79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-30

Downloads
397 (#52,486)

6 months
156 (#22,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Tan
Fordham University

References found in this work

The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Debunking arguments.Daniel Z. Korman - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (12):e12638.
Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism.Katia Vavova - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (2):104-116.

View all 57 references / Add more references