Reproductive Ethics in Commercial Surrogacy: Decision-Making in IVF Clinics in New Delhi, India

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):491-501 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As a neo-liberal economy, India has become one of the new health tourism destinations, with commercial gestational surrogacy as an expanding market. Yet the Indian Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill has been pending for five years, and the guidelines issued by the Indian Council of Medical Research are somewhat vague and contradictory, resulting in self-regulated practices of fertility clinics. This paper broadly looks at clinical ethics in reproduction in the practice of surrogacy and decision-making in various procedures. Through empirical research in New Delhi, the capital of India, from December 2011 to November 2012, issues of decision-making on embryo transfer, fetal reduction, and mode of delivery were identified. Interviews were carried out with doctors in eighteen ART clinics, agents from four agencies, and fourteen surrogates. In aiming to fulfil the commissioning parents’ demands, doctors were willing to go to the greatest extent possible in their medical practice. Autonomy and decision-making regarding choice of the number of embryos to transfer and the mode of delivery lay neither with commissioning parents nor surrogate mothers but mostly with doctors. In order to ensure higher success rates, surrogates faced the risk of multiple pregnancy and fetal reduction with little information regarding the risks involved. In the globalized market of commercial surrogacy in India, and with clinics compromising on ethics, there is an urgent need for formulation of regulative law for the clinical practice and maintenance of principles of reproductive ethics in order to ensure that the interests of surrogate mothers are safeguarded

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rethinking “Commercial” Surrogacy in Australia.Jenni Millbank - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):477-490.
Merit and Money: The situated ethics of transnational commercial surrogacy in Thailand.Andrea Whittaker - 2014 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7 (2):100-120.
Collective informed consent and decision power.Jukka Varelius - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):39-50.
Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Fair trade international surrogacy.Casey Humbyrd - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):111-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-03

Downloads
63 (#231,470)

6 months
8 (#157,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Commodifying bodies.Nancy Scheper-Hughes & Loïc J. D. Wacquant (eds.) - 2002 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India.David Pingree & Gyan Prakash - 2002 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 122 (1):154.
Bodies for sale-whole or in parts.Nancy Scheper-Hughes - 2002 - In Nancy Scheper-Hughes & Loïc J. D. Wacquant (eds.), Commodifying Bodies. Sage Publications. pp. 1--8.

View all 7 references / Add more references