California's Proposition 69: A Dangerous Precedent for Criminal DNA Databases

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):279-293 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On November 2, 2004, California voters elected to radically expand their state criminal DNA database through the passage of Proposition 69. The approved ballot initiative authorized DNA collection and retention from all felons, any individuals with past felony convictions – including juveniles – and, beginning in 2009, all adults arrested for any felony offense. This dramatic database expansion threatens civil liberties and establishes a dangerous precedent for U.S. criminal databases

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Let's Make the DNA Identification Database as Inclusive as Possible.Michael E. Smith - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):385-389.
Use of Forensic DNA Evidence in Prosecutors' Offices.Jeffrey M. Prottas & Alice A. Noble - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):310-315.
Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation.M. Guillen - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (4):266-271.
Quasi-Universal Forensic DNA Databases.Seumas Miller & Marcus Smith - 2022 - Criminal Justice Ethics 41 (3):238-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
61 (#376,143)

6 months
5 (#830,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references