Confucius

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 91-101 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A challenge faced by educators is how to initiate learners into the culture of one’s community without indoctrinating them. This chapter examines the problem of indoctrination in the context of Confucian education. Indoctrination occurs when a person’s capacity to rationally justify one’s beliefs, consider alternatives and make autonomous choices in life is paralysed. It is argued that indoctrination may be avoided when the initiation into the culture of the Zhou dynasty is accompanied by xue and si. The chapter explains how Confucius’ conception of reflective learning aims to enhance rather than handicap the learner’s capacity to formulate and substantiate one’s beliefs, evaluate available options and exercise agency in life. The desired outcome is a reflective and autonomous agent who internalises and demonstrates the quality of humanity through normative behaviours. The chapter also explores the possibility of Confucian indoctrination when the critical and moral dimensions of reflective learning are marginalised or jettisoned.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Concepts of indoctrination: philosophical essays.Ivan Snook - 1972 - Boston,: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Confucius’s view of learning.Yuanbiao Lin - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (13):1180-1191.
Beyond Rote-Memorisation: Confucius’ Concept of Thinking.Charlene Tan - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (5):428-439.
Character and Autonomy: The Paradox of Moral Education.Michael Reed Taylor - 1982 - Dissertation, The Florida State University
The Pedagogical Dimension of Indoctrination: Criticism of Indoctrination and the Constructivism in Education.Mariana Momanu - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (1):88-105.
Learning, Critical Thinking, and Confucius.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:79-84.
Learning, Critical Thinking, and Confucius.Hye-Kyung Kim - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:79-84.
Learning Considered Within a Cultural Context: Confucian and Socratic Approaches.Roger Gordon Tweed - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Indoctrination and Systems: A Reply to Rebecca Taylor.John White - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (4):760-768.
Indoctrination.J. P. White - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 4 (1):107-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references