An interpretation of theself'from the dynamical systems perspective: a constructivist approach

Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (5-6):5-6 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study attempts to describe the notion of the ‘self’ using dynamical systems language based on the results of our robot learning experiments. A neural network model consisting of multiple modules is proposed, in which the interactive dynamics between the bottom-up perception and the top-down prediction are investigated. Our experiments with a real mobile robot showed that the incremental learning of the robot switches spontaneously between steady and unsteady phases. In the steady phase, the top-down prediction for the bottom-up perception works well when coherence is achieved between the internal and the environmental dynamics. In the unsteady phase, conflicts arise between the bottom-up perception and the top-down prediction; the coherence is lost, and a chaotic attractor is observed in the internal neural dynamics. By investigating possible analogies between this result and the phenomenological literature on the ‘self', we draw the conclusions that the structure of the ‘self’ corresponds to the ‘open dynamic structure’ which is characterized by co-existence of stability in terms of goal-directedness and instability caused by embodiment; the open dynamic structure causes the system's spontaneous transition to the unsteady phase where the ‘self’ becomes aware

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary: Why I Am Not a Dynamicist.Matthew Botvinick - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):78-83.
The construction of chaos theory.Yvon Gauthier - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (3):153-165.
Authors' Response: Systems, Environments, and the Body.H. F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):58-60.
Are dynamical systems the answer?Arthur B. Markman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):50-51.
The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):615-28.
Today's dynamical systems are too simple.Herbert Jaeger - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-644.
DDS: Dynamics of developmental systems. [REVIEW]Evelyn Fox Keller - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):409-416.
Complexly organised dynamical systems.John D. Collier & Clifford A. Hooker - 1999 - Open Systems and Information Dynamics 6 (3):241–302.
Dynamical systems theory as an approach to mental causation.Tjeerd Van De Laar - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):307-332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-14

Downloads
22 (#606,933)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The self and the SESMET.Galen Strawson - 2002 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (4):99-135.
Why think that the brain is not a computer?Marcin Miłkowski - 2016 - APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 16 (2):22-28.
Augustine and an artificial soul.Jeffrey White - forthcoming - Embodied Intelligence 2023.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references