Proving the principle: Taking geodesic dynamics too seriously in Einstein's theory

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (2):137-154 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I critically review the long history of attempts to formulate and derive the geodesic principle, which claims that massive bodies follow geodesic paths in general relativity theory. I argue that if the principle is interpreted as a dynamical law of motion describing the actual evolution of gravitating bodies as endorsed by Einstein, then it is impossible to apply the law to massive bodies in a way that is coherent with his own field equations. Rejecting this canonical interpretation, I propose an alternative interpretation of the geodesic principle as a type of universality thesis analogous to the universality behavior exhibited in thermal systems during phase transitions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A faradayan principle for selecting classical field theories.Olivier Darrigol - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):35 – 55.
Poincare's contributions to relativistic dynamics.Galina Granek - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1):15-48.
Length matters: The einstein–swann correspondence and the constructive approach to the special theory of relativity.Amit Hagar - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (3):532-556.
Einstein's theory of relativity.Max Born - 1924 - New York,: Dover Publications. Edited by Henry Herman Leopold Adolf Brose.
Separable hidden variables theory to explain Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
On Proving Too Much.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):353-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-19

Downloads
83 (#198,229)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Infinite idealizations in physics.Elay Shech - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (9):e12514.
Dependence relations in general relativity.Antonio Vassallo - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (1):1-28.
Conservation, inertia, and spacetime geometry.James Owen Weatherall - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 67:144-159.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Idealization and modeling.Robert W. Batterman - 2009 - Synthese 169 (3):427-446.
Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics.Robert Batterman - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):225-244.
Einstein and Singularities.John Earman & Jean Eisenstaedt - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (2):185-235.

View all 7 references / Add more references