Headaches for epistemologists

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (2):408-433 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Imagine that one must either lose all of one’s certainty about some very important topic – about the meaning of life, for example – or a small amount of certainty about each of one’s more “mundane” beliefs – beliefs about the color of one’s socks, where one’s keys are, whether it will rain, etc. One ought to take the latter loss, no matter how many mundane beliefs are at stake. Conversely, if one had to give up a tiny bit of certainty about the important topic, or all of one’s certainty about most mundane topics, one ought to take the former loss. These two judgments generate what I call the “epistemic headaches-for-lives challenge,” so called because it resembles a challenge in ethics about the relative values of headaches and lives. In this paper, I argue for two things. First, our epistemic theories should accord with these types of judgments, and so must deal with the headaches-for-lives challenge. Second, this is a serious challenge for formal epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,446

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Headaches, Lives and Value.Dale Dorsey - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (1):36.
Limited Aggregation and Risk.Seth Lazar - 2018 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 46 (2):117-159.
Aggregation, Beneficence, and Chance.Tom Dougherty - 2013 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (2):1-19.
Fallibilism.Stephen Hetherington - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
When does epistemic closure fail?M. Yan - 2013 - Analysis 73 (2):260-264.
Political Epistemology.Jeffrey Friedman - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (1-2):i-xiv.
Headaches. [REVIEW]Stephen P. Stich - 1980 - Philosophical Books 21 (2):65-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-06

Downloads
185 (#95,529)

6 months
12 (#120,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Talbot
University of Colorado, Boulder

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Knowledge in a social world.Alvin I. Goldman - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Belief, credence, and norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.
A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism.James M. Joyce - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (4):575-603.

View all 39 references / Add more references