Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):161 (2010)
AbstractNeuroethics studies the ethical, social, and legal issues raised by actual or expected advances in neuroscience. The relevant fields in neuroscience include, but are not limited to, neuroimaging, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychopharmacology, neurogenetics, and neuropsychiatry. For many, neuroethics is best understood as a subcategory of bioethics, and although not all agree, for the purposes of the present collection of articles, this definition is assumed. Although bioethics as a field of study started in the early 1970s as a normative enterprise, mainly practiced by philosophers and theologians, it has since become truly inter- and multidisciplinary, comprising also law, sociology, psychology, gender studies, disability studies, anthropology, history, and many other approaches. What we particularly wanted to do in this issue, however, was to find the most pertinent questions of neuroethics from the viewpoint of philosophy, and the call for papers was drafted accordingly.Tuija Takala, Ph.D., is Academy Research Fellow at the Academy of Finland and Adjunct Professor of Social and Moral Philosophy at the University of Helsinki, Finland. She is president-elect of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care and holds a number of international editorial positions. Her current research interests lie in the conceptual, methodological, and theoretical aspects of philosophical bioethics.FootnotesThe editorial work for this special issue was supported by my project Neuroscience and Norms: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Norms in Neuroimaging / Ethical Concepts and Norms funded by the Academy of Finland
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Neuroethics and Animals: Methods and Philosophy.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):182-187.
Editorial: Examining the Links.Tuija Takala & Matti Häyry - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (2):167-173.
Conceptualizing the “Self” in Neuroethics: An Appeal to Philosophy of Mind.Maxwell J. Smith - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (3):16-17.
Similar books and articles
Guest Editorial: Neuroethics—From Neurotechnology to Healthcare.Judy Illes & Eric Racine - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (2):125-128.
Guest Editorial: The Many Voices of Spanish Bioethics—An Introduction.Pablo Rodríguez Del Pozo & Joseph J. Fins - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (3):214.
Symposium: Neuroethics and Mental Health—Old Wine in New Bottles or a Legitimate New Field of Bioethical Inquiry. [REVIEW]Michael Robertson - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):13-14.
Guest Editorial: Referential Analysis.Nicholas Rescher - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):81 - 83.
Guest Editorial: Referential Analysis in Philosophy.Nicholas Rescher - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3):169 - 174.
Guest Editorial: French Analytic Philosophy Today.Pierre Jacob & Keith Lehrer - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 100 (3):215-216.
Review of Martha J. Farah, Ed., Neuroethics: An Introduction with Readings: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010, Xv+379 Pp. $70 US , $35 US. [REVIEW]Walter Glannon - 2011 - Neuroethics 4 (3):263-265.
Neuroethics and Nanoethics: Do We Risk Ethical Myopia? [REVIEW]Sheri Alpert - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (1):55-68.