Frege proof system and TNC°

Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):709 - 738 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A Frege proof systemFis any standard system of prepositional calculus, e.g., a Hilbert style system based on finitely many axiom schemes and inference rules. An Extended Frege systemEFis obtained fromFas follows. AnEF-sequence is a sequence of formulas ψ1, …, ψκsuch that eachψiis either an axiom ofF, inferred from previous ψuand ψv by modus ponens or of the formq↔ φ, whereqis an atom occurring neither in φ nor in any of ψ1,…,ψi−1. Suchq↔ φ, is called an extension axiom andqa new extension atom. AnEF-proof is anyEF-sequence whose last formula does not contain any extension atom. In [12], S. A. Cook and R. Reckhow proved that the pigeonhole principlePHPhas a simple polynomial sizeEF-proof and conjectured thatPHPdoes not admit polynomial sizeF-proof. In [5], S. R. Buss refuted this conjecture by furnishing polynomial sizeF-proof forPHP. Since then the important separation problem of polynomial sizeFand polynomial sizeEFhas not shown any progress.In [11], S. A. Cook introduced the systemPV, a free variable equational logic whose provable functional equalities are ‘polynomial time verifiable’ and showed that the metamathematics ofFandEFcan be developed inPVand the soundness ofEFproved inPV. In [3], S. R. Buss introduced the first order systemand showed thatis essentially a conservative extension ofPV. There he also introduced a second order system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidence, judgment and truth.Verena Mayer - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):175-197.
Frege on Indirect Proof.Ivan Welty - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):283-290.
Frege's proof of referentiality.Øystein Linnebo - 2004 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2):73-98.
Implicit Proofs.Jan Krajíček - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):387 - 397.
Syntax in Basic Laws §§29–32.Bryan Pickel - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (2):253-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
231 (#82,846)

6 months
6 (#349,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Propositional consistency proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):3-29.
S 3 i andV 2 i (BD).Gaisi Takeuti - 1990 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 29 (3):149-169.
RSUV isomorphisms for TAC i , TNC i and TLS.G. Takeuti - 1995 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 33 (6):427-453.

Add more references