Reefer Madness: Cannabis, the Individual, and Public Policy

In Dale Jaquette (ed.), Cannabis and Philosophy: What Were We Just Talking About? Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 149–161 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a survey of the positive and negative aspects of cannabis use from the point of view of the individual on one hand and from the point of view of the society on the other hand. Health, social, and political motives are all discussed, and the best method of harm reduction is analysed. The upshot is that zero tolerance policy is obsolete, and that most individuals would be better off using cannabis rather than other drugs.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond serving a purpose: additional ethical focuses for public policy agents.Vanessa Scholes - 2011 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Monkey on the back: The nature of addiction.Gregory K. Pike - 2012 - Bioethics Research Notes 24 (3):46.
Why 'health' is not a central category for public health policy.Stephen John - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):129-143.
Prescribing cannabis: freedom, autonomy, and values.M. Hayry - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):333-336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-20

Downloads
657 (#24,679)

6 months
61 (#70,295)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tuomas E. Tahko
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

Toward a Philosophy of Harm Reduction.Shannon Dea - 2020 - Health Care Analysis 28 (4):302-313.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references