Argumentation 18 (1):1-24 (2004)
Abstract |
In this paper, I try to develop an informal model for the analysis and evaluation of argumentative strategies based on active authorities. The explanations necessary to understand the idea of the model and what is modelled are given through the development of the paper. I first give an example of argumentative activities. After that, the main assumption of the model is given. In the third part, the relevant aspects of the argumentative activity are analysed, while the principles of the evaluation are explained in the fourth part. The informal model is presented in the fifth part. In the final remarks, the suggestions for further work are given, as well as a comparison with some related recent works in argumentation theory
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000014817.31435.87 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
An Introduction to Reasoning.Stephen Toulmin, Richard D. Rieke & Allan Janik - 1979 - New York and London: Macmillan.
From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation.Else Margarete Barth & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1982 - Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.
Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority.Douglas Neil Walton - 1997 - University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (289):454-457.
The Problem Of Retraction In Critical Discussion.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1):141-159.
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Evaluating Argumentative Moves in Medical Consultations.Sarah Bigi - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):51-65.
From Connectives to Argumentative Markers: A Quest for Markers of Argumentative Moves and of Related Aspects of Argumentative Discourse. [REVIEW]Assimakis Tseronis - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):427-447.
The Role of Evaluation-Driven Rejection in the Successful Exploration of a Conceptual Space of Stories.Carlos León & Pablo Gervás - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (4):615-634.
Argumentative Bluff in Eristic Discussion: An Analysis and Evaluation.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):383-398.
In Context: Giving Contextualization its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.
A Simulation Model of Intergroup Conflict.Holmes Miller & Kurt J. Engemann - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):355-367.
The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):387-403.
The Nature of Model-Based Understanding in Condensed Matter Physics.Sang Wook Yi - 2002 - Mind and Society 3 (1):81-91.
Developmental Issues in Model-Based Reasoning During Childhood.Patricia H. Miller - 2001 - Mind and Society 2 (2):49-58.
Reconstructing Interactive Argumentative Discourse.Margareth Sandvik - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):419-434.
Is Common Ground a Word or Just a Sound?Paola Cantù - 2007 - In H. V. Hanson (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference: Dissensus & The Search for Common Ground. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1--9.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-24
Total views
12 ( #812,544 of 2,518,494 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,494 )
2010-08-24
Total views
12 ( #812,544 of 2,518,494 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,494 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads