The Helsinki Declaration: why all the fuss?

Nursing Ethics 7 (5):439-450 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since 1964, the Declaration of Helsinki has been accepted internationally as the cornerstone for research ethics. As such it has been incorporated into a number of guidance documents for research undertaken on human subjects. In 1999, the American Medical Association put forward a proposal for wide-ranging revision of the document, which would significantly weaken the rights of research subjects and lower the standards for research on human subjects. This article discusses the probable effects of the most significant proposals for change and argues against them. It also urges nurses, especially those involved in research, to become involved in the international consultation currently being undertaken by the World Medical Association

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After helsinki: Unresolved issues in international research.Ruth Macklin - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):17-36.
Placebo and the helsinki declaration — what to do?Bozidar Vrhovac - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):81-93.
The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections.S. Giordano - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (10):598-603.
Neonatal Pain Relief and the Helsinki Declaration.Robert S. Van Howe & J. Steven Svoboda - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):803-823.
The necessity and the value of placebo.Ernst A. Singer - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):51-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
37 (#422,084)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references