Intentionality of Communication

Schutzian Research 2:181-200 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore how a self-referential social system, although it is not a human being, can be said to “observe.” For this purpose, the article reformulates Niklas Luhmann’s theory of social systems as sociological phenomenology, or the de-consciousness philosophized phenomenology, because a social system has the same structure of intentionality as consciousness: Just as consciousness is always consciousness of something, communication is always communication of something. In correlation to this communicative intentionality, communicated environments come and go as social phenomena. A social system is not a thing, but an autonomously observing subject. Hence, this systems theory takes on the role of a second-order observer: It observes how social systems as first-order observers observe self-referentially because phenomena given to the natural attitude of the first-order observer constitute multiple social realities in daily life. Therefore, the theory of self-referential social systems is not objectivism, but a variation of mundane subjectivist phenomenology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intentionality of Communication.Mitsuhiro Tada - 2010 - Schutzian Research 2:181-200.
Intentionality of Communication: Theory of Self-referential Social Systems as Sociological Phenomenology.Mitsuhiro Tada - 2010 - Schutzian Research. A Yearbook of Worldly Phenomenology and Qualitative Social Science 2:183-202.
Intentionality and communication theory.K. M. Sayre - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1):155-165.
Meaning, intentionality and communication.Pierre Jacob - 2011 - In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 11--25.
Art as an Autopoietic Sub-System of Modern Society.Erkki Sevänen - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):75-103.
Niklas Luhmann and the Body.Francis Halsall - 2012 - The New Bioethics 18 (1):4-20.
Art as a social system.Niklas Luhmann - 2000 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
30 (#550,897)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Collected papers.Alfred Schutz - 1982 - Boston: Distributor for the U.S. and Canada Kluwer Boston. Edited by Maurice Alexander Natanson.
Origins of analytical philosophy.Michael Dummett - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft.Niklas Luhmann - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 61 (2):388-389.

View all 13 references / Add more references