Professional Solidarity Versus Responsibility for the Health of the Public: is a nurses’ strike morally defensible?

Nursing Ethics 4 (4):283-293 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to deliberate the moral and legal dilemma entailed in the weapon of the labour strike as a pressure tactic on the Israeli Finance Ministry regarding job slots, budgets and, in effect, violating the collective agreement signed by the nurses and impairing patients’ treatment, as opposed to refraining from striking and suffering the heavy burden of work, the lack of trained personnel, low wages, and the inability to give patients proper, high quality treatment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nurses' collective responsibility and the strike weapon.James L. Muyskens - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):101-112.
Nurses' Professional and Personal Values.Michal Rassin - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (5):614-630.
The moral responsibility of the hospital.Richard T. De George - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):87-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?