Much Ado about Nothing: Kumārila, Śāntarakṣita, and Dharmakīrti on the Cognition of Non-BeingNichts bleibt nichts: Die Buddhistische Zurückweisung von Kumārila's Abhāvapramāṇa; Übersetzung und Interpretation von Śāntarakṣita's Tattvasaṅgraha vv. 1647-1690 mit Kamalaśīla's Tattvasaṅgrahapañjikā sowie Ansätze und Arbeitshypothese zur Geschichte negativer Erkenntnis in der indischen PhilosophieMuch Ado about Nothing: Kumarila, Santaraksita, and Dharmakirti on the Cognition of Non-BeingNichts bleibt nichts: Die Buddhistische Zuruckweisung von Kumarila's Abhavapramana; Ubersetzung und Interpretation von Santaraksita's Tattvasangraha vv. 1647-1690 mit Kamalasila's Tattvasangrahapanjika sowie Ansatze und Arbeitshypothese zur Geschichte negativer Erkenntnis in der indischen Philosophie [Book Review]
Journal of the American Oriental Society 121 (1):72 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Nichts Bleibt Nichts Die Buddhistische Zurückweisung von Kumarilas Abhavapramana : Übersetzung Und Interpretation von Santaraksitas Tattvasangraha Vv. 1647-1690, Mit Kamala Silas Tattvasangrahapañjika, Sowie Ansätze Und Arbeitshypothesen Zur Geschichte Negativer Erkenntnis in der Indischen Philosophie. [REVIEW]Birgit Kellner, Santaraksita & Kamala Sila - 1997 - Arbeitskreis Für Tibetische Und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.
Much Ado about Nothing: Kumārila, Śāntarakṣita, and Dharmakīrti on the Cognition of Non-Being. [REVIEW]John Taber - 2001 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 121 (1):72-88.
The Tattvasangraha of Santaraksita. Santaraksita, Kamalasila & Ganganatha Jha - 1987 - Oriental Institute.
Śubhagupta on the Cognitive Process.Margherita Serena Saccone - 2014 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (2-3):377-399.
On the Buddha’s Cognition of Other Minds in the Bahirarthaparīkṣā of the Tattvasaṅgraha.Hiroko Matsuoka - 2014 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (2-3):297-307.
The Tattvasangraha. With the Commentary of Kamalasila. Translated Into English by Ganganatha Jha.Ganganatha Santaraksita, Kamalásila & Jha - 1937 - Oriental Institute.
Vadanyaya Vada-Prakriya Ka Tarkika Vi Sleshana Gautamiya Evam Bauddha Nyaya Ke Sandarbha Mem.Ram Chandra Pandeya, Mañju, Dharmakirti & Santaraksita - 1988
Tattvasaṁgraha of Śāntarakṣita, with the Commentary of KamalaśīlaTattvasamgraha of Santaraksita, with the Commentary of Kamalasila.Franklin Edgerton & Embar Krishnamacharya - 1929 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 49:66.
Abhāvapramāṇa and error in Kumārila's commentators.Elisa Freschi - 2008 - Nagoya Studies in Indian Culture and Buddhism: Sad Mbhād Sā 27:1-29.
Dignāga, Kumārila and Dharmakīrti on the Potential Problem of pramāṇa and phala Having Different Objects.Kei Kataoka - 2016 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 44 (2):229-239.
Omniscience and the Rhetoric of Reason: Rationality, Argumentation, and Religious Authority in Śāntarakṣita's Tattvasaṅgraha and Kamalaśīla's Pañjikā.Sara L. McClintock - 2010 - Wisdom Publications.
Wort Und Text Bei Kumarila Bhatta Studie Zur Mittelalterlichen Indischen Sprachphilosophie Und Hermeneutik.Lars Göhler - 1995
Tattvasangraha of Shantaraksita with the Commentary of Kamalashila.Embar Santaraksita, Krishnamacharya & Kamala Sila - 1926 - Central Library.
Studies in Kumārila and ŚaṅkaraStudies in Kumarila and Sankara.Richard V. DeSmet & Wilhelm Halbfass - 1985 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 105 (2):373.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-09-07
Downloads
17 (#641,723)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
2016-09-07
Downloads
17 (#641,723)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
History, philology, and the philosophical study of sanskrit texts.Parimal G. Patil - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (2):163-202.
Facing the boundaries of epistemology: Kumārila on error and negative cognition. [REVIEW]Elisa Freschi - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (1):39-48.
Gaṅgeśa on Absence in Retrospect.Jack Beaulieu - 2021 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 49 (4):603-639.
When Did Svatantra Inference Gain Its Autonomy? Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla as Sources for a Tibetan Distinction.Kevin Vose - 2020 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 48 (4):703-750.
