Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):181-203 (2000)
AbstractHumanism – in the sense that humans alonehave moral standing, or else a surpassing degree of it– has traditionally dominated all of ethicaldiscourse. However, its past formulations havesuccumbed to the temptation merely to stipulate sucha criterion, such as rationality, which nonhumans areoften deemed (without sufficient argument) to failwithout exception. Animal liberationistarguments do exist in counterpoint to traditionalhumanism, but one current difficulty seems to be asimple clash of basic assumptions, with an indecisiveresult. Although the author of this paper is anonanthropocentrist, he attempts to further the moraltheoretical debate by constructing a more powerfulversion of humanism, based in a pursuit of the good,per se. The theory is premised upon viewing humans asgenerally having and leading lives of greater value,in some relevant sense. This essay prefigures theauthor's refutation of humanism, more generally, inthe understanding that such a world view cannot trulybe refuted unless its best version is answered.Whatever the status of this paper's offering of``Obligatory'' Anthropocentrism, the theory can be seento have a great deal more success than itspredecessors in parrying, and apparently outdoing,contemporary animal liberationist philosophies.
Similar books and articles
Non-obligatory anthropocentrism.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):329-335.
Response to Evelyn B. Pluhar's ``non-obligatory anthropocentrism''.David Sztybel - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):337-340.
New adventures in the dialectic of humanism: Todorov, sebald and Agamben.John Grumley - 2008 - Critical Horizons 9 (2):189-213.
The Confessionalization of Humanism in Reformation Germany.Erika Rummel - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Experimentation on humans and nonhumans.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):333-355.
Anthropocentrism as the scapegoat of the environmental crisis: a review.Laÿna Droz - 2022 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 22:25-49.
Business failure in the use of animals: ethical issues and contestations.Kamel Mellahi & Geoffrey Wood - 2005 - Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (2):151-163.
Business failure in the use of animals: Ethical issues and contestations.Kamel Mellahi & Geoffrey Wood - 2005 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 14 (2):151–163.
References found in this work
The case for the use of animals in biomedical research.Carl Cohen - 1986 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press. pp. 206.
Death, misfortune and species inequality.Ruth Cigman - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1):47-64.
An examination and defense of one argument concerning animal rights.Tom Regan - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):189 – 219.
Self-Consciousness and the Rights of Nonhuman Animals and Nature.Richard A. Watson - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (2):99-129.