Teza Duhema czy teza Duhema-Milhauda?

Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria:83-105 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Karl Popper's Philosophy Of Science And Conventionalism.Krzysztof Szlachcic - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 3 (1):19-40.
Conventionalism about what? Where Duhem and Poincaré part ways.Milena Ivanova - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:80-89.
Comment: Duhem's middle way.Ernan McMullin - 1990 - Synthese 83 (3):421 - 430.
Grünbaum on "the Duhemian argument".Laurens Laudan - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):295-299.
Epistemology of a believing historian: Making sense of Duhem's anti-atomism.Klodian Coko - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 50 (C):71-82.


Added to PP

5 (#1,557,834)

6 months
5 (#703,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references