The Role of Bódog Somló in the Revival of Hungarian Legal Philosophy

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 93 (4):540-550 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bódog (Felix) Somló is the most reputable representative of Hungarian legal philosophy at the last turn of the century, whose ouevre greatly contributed to the establishment of the neo-Kantian legal philosophy, the dominant trend preaviling in Central Europe at the time, a development that eventually resulted in modernising the legal scholarship and theoretical thought in law in Hungary. Hungarian jurisprudence can be proud of the fact that Bódog Somló, besides Rudolf Stammler, Gustav Radbruch, Hans Kelsen and Alfred Verdross is regarded as a great representative of European neo-Kantian philosophy of law.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.25162/arsp-2007-0038

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Gedanken Zu Einer Ersten Philosophie.Bódog Somló & Gyula Moór - 1926 - W. De Gruyter.
The Beginnings of Hungarian Legal Philosophical Thinking.József Szabadfalvi - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 96 (3):337-347.
Juristische grundlehre.Bódog Somló - 1927 - Leipzig,: F. Meiner.
Transition and tradition: Can Hungarian traditions of legal philosophy contribute to legal transition?Jozsef Szabadfalvi - 2002 - Rechtstheorie 33 (2-4):167-185.
Teaching the history of legal philosophical thinking in Hungarian legal education.Józsej Szabadfalvi - 2006 - Rechtstheorie 37 (1):109-120.
The sociological tradition of Hungarian philosophy.Tamás Demeter - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1):1-16.
Contemporary legal philosophising: Schmitt, Kelsen, Lukács, Hart, & law and literature, with Marxism's dark legacy in Central Europe (on teaching legal philosophy in appendix).Csaba Varga - 2013 - Budapest: Szent István Társulat.
The First Public Dispute in Hungarian Philosophy: Disagreement about Kant's Philosophy at the Turn of the 18 (th) Century.Ondrej Meszaros - 2010 - Filozofia 65 (10):965-978.
The Background Scenery: "Official" Hungarian Philosophy and the Lukács Circle at the Turn of the Century.László Perecz - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1-2):31 - 43.
Evidences and Quasi-evidences in the Historiography of So Called “National Philosophy” III.O. Mészáros - 2005 - Filozofia 60:784-795.
Introduction to the problems of legal theory: a translation of the first edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure theory of law.Hans Kelsen - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Neokantianism and the Theory of Values in Hungarian Philosophy on the Treshold of the 20th Century.Ondrej Meszaros - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (10):994-1002.
Anti-metaphysical reasoning and sociological approach: roads from nationalism to regionalism in the 19th–20th century Hungarian intellectual tradition. [REVIEW]Gábor Gángó - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1):17-30.
The background scenery: “Official” Hungarian philosophy and the Lukács Circle at the turn of the century.László Perecz - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1-2):31-43.
Facets of 'Ought' in Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law.Carsten Heidemann - 2013 - Jurisprudence 4 (2):246-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-11

Downloads
27 (#569,578)

6 months
7 (#411,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references