Kant, Hegel and the puzzles of McDowell’s philosophy

Diametros 29:110-123 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper seeks to understand the proper motivation of John McDowell’s interest in both Kant and Hegel. It reconstructs his arguments in favour of the Hegelian notion of conceptualized experience, and shows how it affects his reading of Kant’s transcendental philosophy. It concludes with a comparison of McDowell’s position on experience with Hegel’s by pointing out the most important difference regarding the notion of factivity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):274–301.
McDowell, Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit.Stephen Houlgate - 2009 - The Owl of Minerva 41 (1/2):13-26.
Hegel, Mcdowell and Recent Defences of Kant.Sally Sedgwick - 2000 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology (3):229-247.
Response to John McDowell.Stephen Houlgate - 2009 - The Owl of Minerva 41 (1/2):39-51.
McDowell's germans: Response to 'on Pippin's postscript'.Robert B. Pippin - 2007 - European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):411–434.
Experiencing the facts (critical notice of McDowell).Paul M. Pietroski - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):613-36.
The Pittsburgh School, The Given and Knowledge.Tom Rockmore - 2012 - Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Hegel's critique of Kant.Stephen Priest (ed.) - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-29

Downloads
55 (#283,585)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?