Struggle within: evolution and ecology of somatic cell populations
In Cellular and molecular life sciences. pp. 1-10 (forthcoming)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The extent to which normal (nonmalignant) cells of the body can evolve through mutation and selection during the lifetime of the organism has been a major unresolved issue in evolutionary and developmental studies. On the one hand, stable mul- ticellular individuality seems to depend on genetic homogeneity and suppression of evolutionary conflicts at the cellular level. On the other hand, the example of clonal selection of lymphocytes indicates that certain forms of somatic mutation and selection are concordant with the organism-level fitness. Recent DNA sequencing and tissue physiology studies sug- gest that in addition to adaptive immune cells also neurons, epithelial cells, epidermal cells, hematopoietic stem cells and functional cells in solid bodily organs are subject to evolutionary forces during the lifetime of an organism. Here we refer to these recent studies and suggest that the expanding list of somatically evolving cells modifies idealized views of biological individuals as radically different from collectives.
|
Keywords | Cancer Cell competition Driver mutation Mosaicism Multicellularity Somatic evolution |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Regenerative Pathologies: Stem Cells, Teratomas and Theories of Cancer. [REVIEW]Melinda Cooper - 2009 - Medicine Studies 1 (1):55-66.
The Roots of Cancer: Stem Cells and the Basis for Tumor Heterogeneity.Maho Shibata & Michael M. Shen - 2013 - Bioessays 35 (3):253-260.
Cancer Stem Cells Modulate Patterns and Processes of Evolution in Cancers.Lucie Laplane - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (3-4):18.
Do Somatic Cells Really Sacrifice Themselves? Why an Appeal to Coercion May Be a Helpful Strategy in Explaining the Evolution of Multicellularity.Adrian Stencel & Javier Suárez - 2021 - Biological Theory 16 (2):102-113.
Cancer Cells and Adaptive Explanations.Pierre-Luc Germain - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (6):785-810.
The Permissibility of Using Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Techniques on Nonhuman Animals.Jason R. Gatliff - unknown
Somatic Cell Reprogramming for Regenerative Medicine: SCNT Vs. iPS Cells.Guangjin Pan, Tao Wang, Hongjie Yao & Duanqing Pei - 2012 - Bioessays 34 (6):472-476.
The Potentiality of the Embryo and the Somatic Cell.Andrew McGee - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (4-5):689-706.
microRNAs as Novel Regulators of Stem Cell Pluripotency and Somatic Cell Reprogramming.Meng Amy Li & Lin He - 2012 - Bioessays 34 (8):670-680.
In Defense of the Somatic Mutation Theory of Cancer.David L. Vaux - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (5):341-343.
Somatic Evolution of Cells and the Development of Cancer.Dominik Wodarz - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (2):119-122.
Response to “The Tissue Organization Field Theory of Cancer: A Testable Replacement for the Somatic Mutation Theory”. [REVIEW]David L. Vaux - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (9):660-661.
Human Gene Therapy and the Slippery Slope Argument.Veikko Launis - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):169-179.
Response to “In Defense of the Somatic Mutation Theory of Cancer”.Carlos Sonnenschein & Ana M. Soto - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (9):657-659.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-09-04
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2021-09-04
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.