How the divine properties fit together: Reply to gwiazda: Richard Swinburne

Religious Studies 45 (4):495-498 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jeremy Gwiazda has criticized my claim that God, understood as an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly free person is a person ‘of the simplest possible kind’ on the grounds that omnipotence etc. as spelled out by me are omnipotence etc. of restricted kinds, and so less simple forms of these properties than maximal forms would be. However the account which I gave of these properties in The Christian God shows that, when they are defined in certain ways, they all follow from one property of ‘pure, limitless, intentional power’. I argue here that a person who has these properties so defined is a person ‘of the simplest possible kind’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Swinburne on the Simplicity of Theism.Bruce Langtry - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):409 - 426.
God As the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):1 - 24.
The Christian God.Richard Swinburne - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Logika, wszechmoc, Bóg.Ryszard Kleszcz - 2012 - Filo-Sofija 12 (19).

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The intrinsic probability of theism.Calum Miller - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (10):e12523.
Divine Perfection and Creation.R. T. Mullins - 2016 - Heythrop Journal 57 (1):122-134.
Modal Ontological Arguments.Gregory R. P. Stacey - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (8):e12938.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references